.png)
Electronic signatures have become the standard on how we sign contracts, approve deals, and conduct business. But there’s a hidden vulnerability, one that can quietly unravel the entire trust model behind digitally signed documents.
This isn’t a bug buried in code. This isn’t a zero day vulnerability. And this isn’t a takedown of any provider, editor or e-sign solution.
It’s simply a design flaw rooted in the PDF format (ISO 32000) and how editor tools interpret security. And it’s exceedingly simple.
Picture this: you receive a signed contract. Adobe Acrobat shows that reassuring green checkmark, which is a cryptographic seal of authenticity. The document is protected by an AATL certificate (Adobe Approved Trust List), which means it was signed by a trusted organization using vetted cryptographic hardware. All is well. You’ve likely used a major e-sign solution.
Now open that same document in macOS Preview, or similar. Add a square annotation. Maybe highlight a clause. Hit save.
When you reopen the file in Acrobat, something’s missing.
This isn’t a sophisticated hack. It’s an everyday action that millions of people could perform without realizing they’ve just broken the chain of trust and removed a security layer.
Behind the scenes, Preview didn’t delete the original content. It added what’s called an incremental update, which is a layer of new data on top of the original PDF. This is entirely within the bounds of the PDF spec.
But Adobe Acrobat sees this modification and, rather than issuing a bright red alert or flagging potential tampering, it simply removes the signature interface.
Poof. The only indicator that the document was once verified is gone.
What remains is a document that looks fine but is no longer protected. And because the failure is silent, most users will never know.
Have you ever opened up a signature in a text editor? I’ll see a lot of strange characters and a surprising amount of text. This is PostScript. When you look at an AATL signed document you’ll see information like this, but when an annotation is made it is removed.
This isn’t just a technical quirk—it’s a systemic problem:
In legal and regulatory environments, the consequences of these silent failures are profound.
Let’s say you’re in a dispute over a signed contract. A lawyer or judge asks: Was this document really signed by the person in question? Has it been modified? If the signature panel is missing, even a cryptographically signed document becomes suspect.
According to U.S. e-signature law, four elements are critical:
If a document has been modified even accidentally your ability to prove these pillars becomes weaker without understanding how electronic signatures work.
This is in fact why secure signature platforms use cryptography, ie hashing the document and locking it with a trusted certificate. Through a Timestamping Authority (TSA), they record the exact time of the signing, often along with the IP address and geolocation. Think of the hash and the timestamp like fingerprints: if the hash changes, the document has been altered. Simple.
Without this cryptography, you cannot prove the source of trust. You now have two different files with different hashes and no way to prove which is real other than your word. With cryptography and trust services and certificate chains as well as secure record retention, you now have an objective source of truth for the original signed document.
This vulnerability is a reminder that digital trust isn’t a toggle. It’s a fragile, interdependent system.
We can’t rely on a green checkmark alone. We need systems that preserve authenticity even when a document leaves our control and that show us, clearly, when something’s gone wrong.
The future of digital documents isn’t perfect integrity. It's a resilient, transparent trust where users, systems, and organizations all know what happened, when it happened, and whether what you’re seeing is what was really signed.
This is just Part 1 of a series on PDF security.
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It is intended to raise awareness of PDF security challenges and promote better security practices, not to facilitate document tampering or fraud. Organizations should consult qualified legal and security professionals when implementing or evaluating electronic signature workflows for critical business processes.
.png)
.png)
.png)